Why Can’t Foreigners Translate?


I recently replied to a post on Google’s Gmail Help forums regarding phishing, and it touched on an issue I’ve been confused about for years:

[…]

This is the result of a common translator (Google’s , Babelfish, etc.) being used on perfect grammar-from
another country.

Now for years the question has remained as to why an Asian, or other, company wouldn’t just spend a few quick dollars and have their text proof read? I’m not talking (necessarily) about the phishing expeditions, but in all matters foreign where they know an English audience will be reading their material? I’ve been to Asia, and it is crazy how proud they are of their own country and culture. They would rather spend their energy and time making a knock-off of [insert virtually any product type here] than to use that ingenuity to make
their own brand, and establish their countries as those known for making good _original_ goods, instead of really good knock-offs.

Trust me on this, as I have purchased a LOT of Asian knock-offs, and they are a terrific value-as long as you realize what they actually are.

There is no translator that converts perfect to perfect… but this next one is probably even better than the first.

The top part of the sign is in English, but when they emailed someone to translate that English into Welsh, the response actually said “I am not in the office at the moment. Please send any work to be translated.” That’s right, it’s an out of office message, which subsequently made it onto the road sign undetected. We hope those residents are getting used to Welsh truck drivers carrying heavy goods. from here.

Translation, although it would cost just a few dollars, is something I believe is outside their comfort zone with regard to national (cultural) pride.

So. Attention all Asian, Welsh and other companies wanting to get into the US markets by translating your manuals, instructions, and yes-even banners-into English: Send me your broken English and I will make it perfect. I will charge only $5 USD per document, up to 500 characters. How can you miss with that? Email me for my PayPal account!

please_leave_your_valuables_11989

So who is sitting in front, again?
So who is sitting in front, again?
Yes, they do!
Yes, they do!
I don't see it! Do you?
I don't see it! Do you?
Lord knows, I've tried!
Lord knows, I've tried!
Need some spare change when abroad?
Need some spare change when abroad?
Just like at the casino!
Just like at the casino!
Nobody dries crack lik ethe Asians!
Nobody dries crack lik ethe Asians!
I'm calling No.8, just in case!
I'm calling No.8, just in case!
Nobody would be dumb enough to put something in STONE without checking with me first, would they?
Nobody would be dumb enough to put something in STONE without checking with me first, would they?
You want creative? You got it!
You want creative? You got it!
Would this work over here?
Would this work over here?
You might as well take one more step!
You might as well take one more step!

Lets see if I can help clean up the masses of virtually unintelligible translations out there! :)

“Best of Breed” or “Packaged Solution”?

Q: With the apparent shift from a direct software solution to one of a more bundled offering with OEM providers such as Dell and HP, could you share some thoughts as what is driving this trend?

This is an old shift, and it happens all the time. While every software vendor want to burn CDs and count their money, consumers don’t, well, consume like that. All software vendors create “solutions”. That is, if you ask them. In reality, though, they are simply applications-applications that need a machine to run in/on. True solution selling involves not leaving a single decision with the prospect/customer.

Unfortunately, if all you sell is one piece of the “solution”, you are leaving other decisions out of your hands. Many times, a prospect will consider the prospect of putting all these pieces together simply too difficult, and will dismiss the entire concept. So how do you battle this?

You “package” your software as a “solution”. You take all the guesswork out of the equation by acting as the expert you purport to be and put the software in a place/configuration where it is most effective. The reasoning is that prospect/customer is, understandably, the least qualified to make this combination in a way that will work best. Hardware is no good without software, and software is no good without hardware. So why would any software company NOT want to do this?

The reason is all about money. You figured it was getting to that, right? The first cloud on the horizon is that lead exchange programs are notoriously one-sided, and always lead to rough relations between partners. In other words, who owns the account? Should the hardware folks sell a solution that they didn’t write? Will a bad solution running on their box bode well for their image/branding?

The second problem is finger pointing. In the heat of troubleshooting, it is common to divert blame (I coined the term Blame Management in the mid-90s). The customer just sees a solution that doesn’t work, and a few responsible vendors acting, well, irresponsible.

Next is the problem whereby your partner, whom you are forced to combine forces with, has an inferior product. The result is that you look bad, and all they care about is moving product, not repeat business.

Finally, the question of support. When the solution stops working, who do they call? Will the software vendor require that the customer first call the hardware vendor to rule out their hardware before they pay to take a peek? What about the other way around?

If you were a prospect given the, well, prospect of these very likely and common scenarios, you might vote to put the pieces together yourself. The vendors might well even agree with you.

Q: Do you believe this is a trend that will continue? What are the product development trends?

Like I said, this trend is set on a pendulum. Pundits like Forrester and Gartner make their money telling companies how they should change what they do. If they came in and said the last folks that were there did a great job, they couldn’t very well justify a paycheck, now could they? So do the math. If you are buying components, they will suggest “solutions”. If you have “solutions”, they will suggest “best of breed components”.

If the company can’t afford to tell one of these companies what they want to be told, they can supplant this entity with a consultant. The result is the same.

pat
:)